Location: Government Reform

Discussion: Campaign Finance ReformReported This is a featured thread

Showing 5 posts
ozideas
ozideas
Campaign Finance Reform
Feb 14 2008, 7:14 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 14 2008, 7:14 AM EST
I think we should limit campaign contributions to $2000 to the parties (state and/or federal), outlaw contributions from corporations and unions, and require candidates to record and post publically all contributions (and spending) over $50. 36  out of 54 found this valuable. Do you?    
trgh
trgh
1. RE: Campaign Finance Reform
Feb 21 2008, 11:24 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 21 2008, 11:24 PM EST
Absolutely!
How else will we prevent those with the most money and influence from getting their own way?
Do you find this valuable?    

Posted Anonymously
2. RE: Campaign Finance Reform
Feb 26 2008, 11:47 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 26 2008, 11:47 PM EST
For the major parties that get roughly $2 in taxpayers money for every primary vote this might not have much impact. However for micro parties that must pay $500 per candidate simply to be on the ballot paper and who generally get $0 from the taxpayer this would be crippling. However if you like the two party dominance of the existing system then by all means nobble the little guys. 0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Andy38
3. RE: Campaign Finance Reform
Feb 27 2008, 1:14 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 27 2008, 1:14 AM EST
This is just incumbency protection 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Posted Anonymously
4. RE: Campaign Finance Reform
Feb 27 2008, 5:28 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 27 2008, 5:28 PM EST
I'd rather not have a limit - but force all donations to be open. 4  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)